Picking Splinters: Splinters' Picks

bracket updated

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
I know a lot about college basketball. My girlfriend knows a lot about shoes.
I know this because last year she dragged me to Discount Shoe Warehouse so she could she spend her NCAA Tournament pool winnings. I have since recouped the financial damage, but the mental scars may never heal.
Even for experts, picking a winning bracket is a crap shoot. John Wooden couldn't pick a perfect bracket even if he had Miss Cleo on speed dial. You could pour over statistics, RPI ratings and geographical considerations for days and still be defeated by your mother who picked all the teams with blue uniforms, giving the edge to the Catholic schools.
I already hate my bracket. It's preposterous. I have at least five picks that are almost certain to doom me to another year of shoe shopping, but I'm going to stick with them and below I'll tell you why.
I'll keep you all updated as this catastrophe unfolds in the comments section below, but first here is the thinking behind my top four upsets … and the counterpoints that make me think these will be the final four nails in my bracket's coffin.
Drake over Connecticut
At the end of February, UConn looked like a Final Four contender. Then they lost to Providence (again) and fell in their first Big East Tournament game to West Virginia. Against the Mountaineers, UConn did not contest shots and did not rebound. West Virginia, particularly Joe Alexander (34 points), got great looks at the hoop and converted them.
If there's one thing that Drake does well, it's shoot. The Huskies can cause some chaos with their press, but in their half-court defensive sets they've relied a lot on center Hasheem Thabeet's shot-blocking capability. I think Drake can neutralize Thabeet with their perimeter shooting and get him to the bench. That's a necessity though, since the Bulldogs (whose tallest player is 6-foot-8) have no one who can match up against Thabeet inside.

fcnp.com


Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 22nd, 2008 at 3:57 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

16 Responses to “Picking Splinters: Splinters' Picks”

  1. Earnestine Says:

    I can certainly agree that true and total equality under the law has never been achieved, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t something that shouldn’t be strived for.But over the last 7 years we seem to be drifting to a point where certain human beings can arbitrarily disregard the law, and certain persons can disregard the acts and statutes of society which apply to them. In this sense, I mean restore to the previous striving for equality for all as equals under the law.More news and more open government may even make the aim achievable. Either this, or the continual centralization of wealth and power in the hands of fewer and fewer that disregard even the fundamental common law, and the worsening lies and deception they tell.

  2. Graeme Says:

    It’s a real shocker that people are upmodding you. I have to question the political understanding of the readers here.The purpose of the police is to regulate behavior according to laws which, usually, are for the common good. Even when faulty, they are established systematically. The punishments associated with infractions are not arbitrary, but are designed to discourage that behavior.If the police accepted five-dollar bribes you would have 1) Police who work with the same profit-minded attitude as car salesmen, and 2) Much, much, much more reckless driving.As soon as bribes for speeding are acceptable, bribes for white-collar crimes immediately follow, which are followed by bribes for rape, murder, etc.

  3. Robina Says:

    This just underscores the difference in tactics used by local vs. federal law enforcement.Local cops beat you up and/or taze you; federal agents disappear you and/or burn down your compound while you’re all holed up inside.

  4. Quianna Says:

    No way, Rambo was the one doing the ass kicking.

  5. Marge Says:

    A real-world Jack Bauer wouldn’t be anything like a TV-world Jack Bauer.

  6. Jaquelyn Says:

    . . . thus showing that cops aren’t likely to become more reasonable for fear of running up against federal agents again.

  7. Christabella Says:

    wow! The police dept sure are circling the wagons! You’d think they’d hang these rogue cops out to dry in at least an attempt to save face.I hope the cops get fired & are never allowed to be cops ever again, but its extremely doubtful.

  8. Laurie Says:

    Those philandering, cross-dressing, make-up wearing rouge cops are so corrupt.

  9. Cyril Says:

    Is anyone else deeply dismayed at how misleading this title is? I was expecting he was the wrong guy to rough up because he completely schooled them in the ways of the covert agent and left them a quivering mass of crying man flesh.

  10. Jarrett Says:

    Reminds me of Chicago.

  11. Carry Says:

    Soon to be “In brilliant move to increase officer morale, officers on paid suspension will now receive overtime pay in order to compensate for mental anguish.”

  12. Kerry Says:

    they are lucky this time. next time it might be federal agent Jack Bauer. then they are screwed…

  13. Reena Says:

    No, you don’t have to be connected. I know someone who was beat up by cops because he didn’t speak English. He got a good enough settlement to retire. Unfortunately, he can’t walk straight anymore.

  14. Cordula Says:

    That’s pretty much what I’m hoping for.

  15. Virginia Says:

    Exactly.