A city hangs on his every word
His voice belongs to then and now, an audio clip that carries us back to a bygone era even as it keeps us up-to-the-minute updated.
It has been there as long as big-league baseball has been in this city, actually pre-dating the Los Angeles Dodgers by several years, which was the biggest advantage the Dodgers had when they first arrived in 1958, certainly more important than any of the fading stars on the playing roster.
When Vin Scully settled in behind his microphone at the Coliseum 50 years ago, Los Angeles had the narrator it needed and the Dodgers had the pitchman they required to break the ice, to melt any pockets of resistance that might have been scattered around the Southland.
He has been at it ever since, his tenure an L.A. story unlike any other, providing a sense of permanence to a city perfectly captured by Steve Martin’s line in the movie “L.A. Story”: “Some of these buildings are more than 20 years old!”
But as the Dodgers crank up the celebratory machine to mark their 50th anniversary in Los Angeles, a different emotion surfaces when considering Scully’s place with the Dodgers. Scully is 80 and in the last year of his contract with the club. He hasn’t yet decided on his plans for after this season. For the time being, anyway, every game, every inning Scully’s calls carry with them an underlying, undeniable theme for listeners: Let us enjoy them while we can.
Scully represents more than an era in Los Angeles sports history; he also represents an era in sports broadcasting when announcers were as indelibly linked to the teams they covered as the logo on the players’ caps.
When Scully was hired by the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1950, his contemporaries included Mel Allen with the Yankees and Russ Hodges with the Giants. They were icons, with larger-than-life personas, as they served as the immediate conduits of information and news to fans hungry for details about their teams.
Tags: dodgers, radio
March 31st, 2008 at 7:07 pm
That’s the impression I got, and that goes back to ‘hiding the tax rate’.When I buy a loaf of bread, I don’t know if money changed hands 15 times, or 43 times, so I have no way of knowing what my actual tax rate is.
March 31st, 2008 at 7:57 pm
This guy is awesome!!!
March 31st, 2008 at 8:48 pm
smug prick what Romney is.
March 31st, 2008 at 9:38 pm
than not then.
March 31st, 2008 at 10:29 pm
Periwinkle Blue.
March 31st, 2008 at 11:20 pm
It’s not VAT. It is the Transaction Tax.It is not regressive, because no matter how much money one would accumulate, in the end it has to be spent. And that’s when it gets taxed. It would however burden those who like to siphon funds outside the country to avoid taxation or speculative middle men who raise prices of goods for no good reason, but that would be a good thing.The actual amount of tax rate would have to be calculated based on total amount circulating and could be adjusted annually. And to offset and help those who are absolutely poor, one could give a flat rate rebates each year to bring the median up.
April 1st, 2008 at 12:10 am
Actually, I think it’s more like the money you earn goes 100% to paying off interest to the fed reserve.
April 1st, 2008 at 1:01 am
I’d have guessed yoda.