COLUMN: Watkins: My Giants: Predictably unpredictable
The Giants plan a season-long 50-year anniversary celebration this year - bobbleheads, reunions, posters and commemorative giveaways galore.
Great timing, considering memories are about the only thing the Giants have going for them this season. The first signs of gloom and doom should appear Monday - if they haven’t already - when they open the season against the Dodgers in Los Angeles.
I’ve hung tough with the Giants for most of their 50 years in San Francisco. We have much in common.
We both arrived in the San Francisco Bay Area in the same year (1958), we both are known more for our failures than achievements (however meager they might be), neither of us appears to have many fans these days (we’ve both been accused of being too old and overpaid) and the immediate future for the two of us closer to dreadful than dazzling.
How did it all go so haywire?
Having moved to Sunnyvale from drizzly Portland, Ore., at age 8, I spent three carefree years throwing apricots at my neighbor’s garage door, riding bikes on dusty dirt roads through acres of orchards and placing pennies on railroad tracks for freight trains to flatten.
But I had a life-changing experience at age 11 when my dad took me to a night game at Candlestick Park in 1961. The Cubs were in town. The Giants lost 5-4.
You’d think I could take a hint.
Only things got better in a hurry.
I became Willie Mays’ greatest fan, I marveled at Juan Marichal’s high leg kick (he looked like someone about to fall off a cliff) and once I heard Russ Hodges on the radio broadcasting Giants games, I knew I had struck it rich. His signature “Bye, bye, baby” home run call remains the greatest of all time.
I’ll never forget the sight of Russ Hodges in the radio booth at Dodger Stadium during a typical tense late-inning game in the 1960s when the television camera showed his ashtray nearly overflowing with cigarette butts.
Tags: dodgers, radio
March 31st, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Another ironic thing is that the Constitution is still the core of the law of the land. We (the government) still obey it, or legislate to duck it. When people say it’s outdated, that’s a cool opinion, but meaningless without a Constitutional convention.
March 31st, 2008 at 8:57 pm
You have good arguments and I enjoy the discussion. Given current state of taxation, where the more you make the less you pay proportionally (creative accounting, interpretation of what’s considered an income, tax breaks on dividends, salaries in the form of stock options, etc), we hardly can be worse with any other system.We do need to examine other possibilities too. Too bad more than often people just dismiss it or give a blanket statement “this would be a very bad idea” with no backing.
March 31st, 2008 at 9:48 pm
It’s the old generation (baby boomers) who grew up watching television. They have no critical thinking skills and are only able to form thoughts within the narrow reality defined for them by the television. A few of them tried to think for themselves during the late 60’s but they were quickly squashed by Nixon. Today’s generation has the Internet where ideas can freely flow and be adopted after scrutiny. Let’s hope the new generations don’t waste the opportunity and allow themselves to be squashed like their parents.
March 31st, 2008 at 10:38 pm
smug prick what Romney is.
March 31st, 2008 at 11:29 pm
If this woman becomes our President, I’m leaving this country until she’s out. What a snake.
April 1st, 2008 at 12:20 am
I don’t really know much about this guy. Is his talk show very popular? I hope so.
April 1st, 2008 at 1:10 am
Sorry guys, I’m voting for Ron Paul, but I think the host is a douche bag. The only thing Romney did wrong was not realize the whole segment was a ploy to get the host to run to Ron Paul. Mark Larsen suggests to Romney that he employ a whole new tax system, then when Romney politely disagrees, Larsen goes crazy and says he’s voting for Paul. Come on, he was voting for Ron Paul in the first place and this was a way to increase ratings. He’s going to have his highest viewership tomorrow. Smart move, but he’s still a douche bag.
April 1st, 2008 at 2:01 am
You’re voting, rosejonescolour? You write suspiciously like a Canadian or Brit.
April 1st, 2008 at 2:51 am
Good. Let’s criticize Romney’s religion rather than his positions.