Pa. Coalition Proposes Chesapeake Bay Clean-up Plan

pa state tax

Earlier this year, many Pennsylvania municipal waste treatment plants were put on notice that they had to clean up their act, and meet much tougher clean water standards. Instead of biting the potentially huge local tax burden, they responded by suing the Department of Environmental Protection.
Governor Ed Rendell responded by proposing a modest increase in funding for local sewage treatment plant upgrades. This week, a broad coalition of organizations announced a much larger proposal of their own. Agriculture has a piece of what’s called the Pennsylvania Fair Share for Clean Water Plan.
The plan, supported by Pennsylvania Farm Bureau, Pennsylvania Municipal Authorities Association, Pennsylvania Builders Association, Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts and the Chesapeake Bay Foundation would help wastewater plant ratepayers and farmers finance improvements needed to address Chesapeake Bay and statewide water quality improvement mandates.
“For the first time, the five groups that have the most at stake in meeting the water quality mandates have put together a funding plan we hope will help end the controversy over how these projects should be paid for,” noted Matthew Ehrhart, CBF’s Executive Director for Pennsylvania. Here’s what’s in the $170 million package:
$100 million to help wastewater plants finance required improvements;
$50 million in direct cost share aid to farmers to install conservation practices, including $35 million for REAP farm tax credits and $15 million in cost share grants;
$10 million to county conservation district to expand technical assistance to farmers;
$10 million to restore cuts to the Department of Agriculture budget in farm programs.
The plan also calls for reforms to the state’s nutrient credit trading program that will help to make it a viable alternative to provide for both environmental improvements to the Bay and sufficient future sewage capacity for new development.
Why state must face its commitment
“Production agriculture is facing significant and potentially devastating economic burdens, said Joel Rotz, governmental relations director for Pennsylvania Farm Bureau. “Farmers are trying to comply with increased regulations recently imposed under revisions to federal and state regulations governing the handling and land application of manure and other nutrients, but they cannot do it alone.”

americanagriculturist.com


Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, April 14th, 2008 at 8:47 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

15 Responses to “Pa. Coalition Proposes Chesapeake Bay Clean-up Plan”

  1. Hallie Says:

    It may simply be that the RP supporters were simply positioned close to the part of the room he wanted to shoot.

  2. Wenona Says:

    As of last week I used to like watch, as well as other left-leaning news outlets (I just don’t listen to one side of the story). I know most, if not ALL, news media outlets are biased (yes, even ABC, MSNBC, CBS, New York Times, Washington Post, etc.) and other not as much biased (BBC and others). I consider myself common-sense, but the crap I’ve been finding out of how Fox conducts their “unbiased” reporting has gotten me mad.Can ANY media claim to report the unbiased truth? The only one that even comes close is the online community. Even Reddit is left/socialist biased and Daily KOS practically Communistic, but I still read for informative information as well as right-leaning online information sites. A little from Column A and a little from Column B is the right mixture.But, Fox news will get less of my attention, especially O’reilly. But, I still like Glenn Beck a lot (no, I’m not a religious person).

  3. Amice Says:

    None of us know a thing about any candidate’s chances until primaries roll around.

  4. Dahlia Says:

    CNN, Democracy Now or NPR.

  5. Earlene Says:

    exactly.A real journalist would point the cameras at the crowds and report on what is there. Instead, these guys were searching for the camera angle that distorts reality and fits their agenda.

  6. Tianna Says:

    Not at all. They know what their advertising medium is worth, and they expect to be paid for using it. Pretty clearly, he was telling the camera man not to give a bunch of free advertising to all the Ronbots holding up signs.

  7. Symphony Says:

    That would be true if he didn’t mention one and only one candidate by name and direct his camera crew to NOT film the supporters of that one particular candidate.

  8. Titty Says:

    Why is that the most fair and balanced if that’s what the people want? Why does Ron Paul have to be the exception rather than the rule at these debates? I bet your average Ron Paul supporter has more of a clue as what’s going on than the average damnocrat or repuke, so it should make sense that ounce for ounce and pound for pound that Ron Paul’s supporters would be more vocal, more adamant than your average voter, so they, the Ron Paul supporters, would ensure that they attend these meetings.

  9. Jody Says:

    by your definition, aren’t all news outlets censoring on a daily basis? Isn’t downvoting on reddit a form of censorship?

  10. Rashaun Says:

    And this is why my hosts file has foxnews.com point to 127.0.0.1.

  11. Bevis Says:

    Imagine you are a troll and everything you say on reddit is actually bad. Can you tell me what would you tell yourself so that you stop trolling ? The reason I respond to you is that I’m honestly trying to figure out what goes in a mind of a troll. It is very appealing to me so I respond to them by poking and being one at times.

  12. Scarlett Says:

    Thou shalt not extrapolate from thee unto others.

  13. Elly Says:

    http://www.frokk.com

  14. Aloysius Says:

    Yes, they suck and are not fair and balanced, but claiming censorship, at least to my ears, sounds like something illegal.