Live from Deadline USA's Pennsylvania Election Central Situation …
Philadelphia - “That was Bill Clinton, here on the DVE Morning Show,” the breakfast-time DJ was saying as I left Pittsburgh early this morning. “In a few moments, Senator Barack Obama, here on the DVE Morning Show. That’s not a joke.” The candidates and their surrogates are in ceaseless motion, blanketing the state with exhortations to get out and vote, and local radio is crucial; former and potential future presidents certainly aren’t too grand to drop in, albeit by telephone, for conversations with stations like Pittsburgh’s WDVE Rocks, home of Hair Band Idol 2008.
Meanwhile, below the fold, some snippets reaching us here in Philadelphia at Deadline USA’s Pennsylvania Primary Election Central. (It’s like CNN’s Situation Room, except where they have banks of plasma screens and scrolling LED displays, I have a tragic little coffee-maker, and where they have Wolf Blitzer, I have… no Wolf Blitzer! Every cloud has a silver lining.)
*At Politico, some random bits of anecdata from around Pennsylvania suggest a sizeable turnout. The weather’s lovely, which should help.
*The New York Times’s Adam Nagourney ties himself in knots trying to figure out what would constitute a true win for Clinton tonight. He appears to think a margin as small as 5% might still be credible. Clinton’s spokesman Phil Singer, meanwhile, claims that “a win is a win is a win.” I think that’s called “expectations management.”
*Bill Clinton gets seriously tetchy with a reporter in Pittsburgh over his earlier comment that “they”, meaning the Obama campaign, had “played the race card on me.” This morning, he seemed to deny he’d ever made that remark.
*The Philadelphia Daily News notices a weird anti-Obama ad apparently mocking his supporters as befuddled youngsters, paid for by a ‘junk mail mogul’ with sort-of connections to the Drudge Report.
Time to go and pester some voters.
Tags: news, pennsylvania
April 22nd, 2008 at 5:07 pm
All your ad clicks are belong to us.
April 22nd, 2008 at 5:57 pm
I beleive they know yahoo is a weak buy as well. They are more after Yahoo’s huge userbase.
April 22nd, 2008 at 6:48 pm
I’m pretty sure that if this hostile takeover would actually happen, a substantial part of Yahoo’s senior developers and other core people would quit.yahoo has had high turnover in all depts for some time…anyone antsy to leave likely already has, often because the huge fluctuations in the stock over the years has created a situation where many key senior people ended up with lots of worthless stockyahoo is already a big, near-faceless bureaucracy. being part of microsoft wouldn’t be a huge change.lots of people can put up with some stink for more moneymy guess is that turnover in developers based solely on not wanting to be part of msft would be less than 1%
April 22nd, 2008 at 7:38 pm
What kind of company does Microsoft think they are? Software, hardware, or investment bank?
April 22nd, 2008 at 8:29 pm
I think they are about eliminating competition rather than the user base.If M$ eliminates all your options, then youre stuck with shitty M$ monopoly products and they get rich.That’s M$’s M.O. - buy up and devalue the competition so there is no competition.Theyre not as rich as they used to be, so i feel now it will back fire and they will be reduced to a mid cap stock when this yahoo mess is over.
April 22nd, 2008 at 9:19 pm
“Windows 7 may come ‘in the next year’” != less than a year away. It’s more like 9 months to 18 months. And don’t forget the word ‘may’.Furthermore, many have speculated that Windows 7 may very well just be Vista repackaged with some changes such as modularization. I think that sounds reasonable. Don’t forget that the standard Windows OS replacement cycle is about 3 years, except for XP.
April 22nd, 2008 at 10:10 pm
Microsoft buying Yahoo could very well be the end of an era. After channelling so much money on Vista and their now marginally profitable Home and Entertainment industry, they risk overextending themselves with the purchase of Yahoo.What MS doesn’t understand is that internet service companies must deliver quality quickly or risk becoming irrelevant. They cannot afford to spend two to three years like their H&E. Yahoo is a weak buy, and offers nothing of considerable value in addition to MS’s own offerings on MSN.
April 22nd, 2008 at 11:01 pm
SEARCH ENGINES! SEARCH ENGINES! SEARCH ENGINES! SEARCH ENGINES! SEARCH ENGINES! SEARCH ENGINES! SEARCH ENGINES! SEARCH ENGINES!EDIT: its getting a little old, isnt it.
April 22nd, 2008 at 11:51 pm
Some of the downsides would be that Microsoft would also get flickr,yahoo answers, yahoo pipes, yahoo mobile,etc.