Reading the Health Care Tea Leaves for 2009
With Election Day almost six months away, no one knows the answers, but top health care analysts, pollsters, and advisers offered insights at a Washington, D.C., forum Tuesday — and some surprising answers. They suggested, for example, that the Iraq War might increase rather than decrease the chances of an overhaul, and that while the public looks to Democrats more than Republicans for answers on health care, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the presumed GOP presidential nominee, may have embraced an unexpectedly strong strategy in focusing on health costs rather than universal coverage.
Democratic pollster Celinda C. Lake conceded at the forum sponsored by the policy journal Health Affairs that McCain is “very audacious and very smart in leading on cost.” People come to the health overhaul debate as consumers, not altruists, she said. Their gut concern is “what’s it going to do with my coverage.”
Worries about unaffordable care cause insured Americans to cling more tightly to their current health care benefits, she suggested, adding that they are likely to resist proposals that water down their current benefits to pay for universal coverage. Lake also noted that insured Americans can bring the greatest political pressure to bear on the health care debate.
“Ironically, one of the strongest predictors of not voting is not having health insurance,” she said.
Although Americans see health care as a right, they worry about the cost implications of universal coverage, including longer waits for care and less access to doctors, according to Lake. Women — who Lake sees as key to how the next election will turn out and to the fate of health care proposals in the next few years — worry that instead of having 25 minutes with the doctor they will only have 10 minutes.
Americans also want a uniquely American answer to the problems in the health care system. “They recognize that the U.S. system is in crisis, but they seek to improve the system instead of adopting a foreign model,” Lake and her co-authors wrote in an article released Tuesday by Health Affairs. “The majority of America is not fine with going to government health clinics,” she told the forum.
Tags: current, health, news
May 15th, 2008 at 10:14 am
Umm the Secret Service also handles counterfeiting. Which is a needed service.Besides no one so large upon the world stage should be completely at the mercy of every loony who hears voices from his toaster.
May 15th, 2008 at 11:04 am
ditto
May 15th, 2008 at 11:55 am
Sure, but then it would be a federal offense. And since each transaction would be known to the consumer it would be a lot harder to hide than would be the pentagon paying $300,000 for a screw driver.My ultimate idea would be for the government to absorb the current “health insurance.” So all those little companies would be integrated into a government beauro. This way you don’t have to hire more people or pull a government beauro out of your ass.Basically you just nationalize the current industry and then adopt some price fixing for a year or so.Also it’ll probably be necessary to either refinance or forgive the debt of a lot of doctors to get more doctors into the system and to keep the ones we have from quitting. Most of them are in it for the money and if they feel they can’t make a million dollars by the time their 40 they will likely go into medical research.
May 15th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Rock on, Edwards.
May 15th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
i like his proposal, and of course it’s grandstanding. however, the article is terrible. why won’t this announcement get as much attention as clinton’s? because she announced a whole health care proposal, which everybody’s been awaiting for a variety of obvious reasons. edwards already announced his.
May 15th, 2008 at 2:26 pm
Being from North Carolina, I disagree with you greatly. John Edwards certainly has had a national focus for quite some time, I will not argue with that. Much of his policy including the Patients Bill of Rights was equally beneficial to the country as a whole as for North Carolinians. You would be just as hard-pressed to come up with a single piece of successful North-Carolina-Specific legislation that has come from the desk of Dole, Faircloth or Burr. In fact, you would be hard-pressed to find almost any state-specific legislation coming out of any senator’s office these days. What Senators do most for their states are buried deep in amendments and pork-barrel additions.Luckily, you won’t read too much about Edwards doing that in the Senate either, seeing as he refused PAC contributions.
May 15th, 2008 at 3:17 pm
oh, for crying out loud
May 15th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
this is such an excellent idea because it allows the voters to strike back at the political elite by taking away their healthcare. An amazing tour de force.This strategy strikes to the heart of what americans think of our political elite. WE HATE THEM AND WE WANT TO PUNISH THEM. Edwards is gonna let us do that if we elect him.I never thought I would vote for another politcian, but I might have to vote for him….