Callpod Dragon
While Bluetooth headsets vary widely in design and sound quality, many of them offer the same old set of features: call answer, call reject, voice dialing, and the typical theoretical range of 33 feet. Callpod wants to go farther with the Dragon, literally, with a claimed extended range of up to 328 feet. You also get dual-mic noise canceling, two-way headset-to-headset communication mode, and a generous array of included accessories.
The Dragon is available in three colors—black chrome, carbon fiber, and titanium silver (like my test unit). The package includes the headset, an AC/DC wall adapter, a car charger, a USB charging cable, and a five-pin mini USB adapter. With all that gear, you’ll never be far from a full charge, which takes only 2 hours. There’s also a zippered carrying pouch and an extra, larger ear loop, which I needed; in fact, for me, both of the ear loops felt tight. The larger one felt okay once I managed to put the headset on, a task that never got any easier, even after numerous attempts. The upside was that between the ear loop and the in-ear, rubber design of the earpiece, I could walk, run, or shake my head without its budging even slightly.
Users who also make Skype calls will particularly appreciate the Dragon’s ability—shared with the Plantronics Voyager 520—to connect to two separate devices simultaneously (say, a mobile phone and a PC). It has enough memory, in fact, for eight total connections. I had no problem pairing the Dragon with a BlackBerry 8130. But I had less luck with a Motorola Q; on every attempt except one I experienced a connection error, even with the nearby BlackBerry 8130 powered off to prevent conflicts.
Worse, the headset’s voice quality wasn’t great. Voices sounded muffled, mechanical, and distant on my side. That’s with the earpiece inserted firmly in my ear, and both the Dragon and the BlackBerry 8130 turned up to maximum volume. Callers thought that my voice’s timbre was natural enough, but one person noticed a “speakerphone” effect when I spoke.
Tags: 2, aliph, jawbone
May 16th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Maybe that’s why it’s called the paradox dragon.
May 16th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Well, I think that the middle one is less ambiguously switching, so I believe my point still stands - the middle one is definitely a switcher.As I look closer though, it does appear as though the third also is.
May 16th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
That’s some fancy logic — but here’s a tip — the right head switches in panels 2 & 3 as well. Also, it’s a bleedin’ joke(!)
May 16th, 2008 at 5:15 pm
BARF
May 16th, 2008 at 6:06 pm
just drink the wine
May 16th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
I agree with quaff. The middle one is lying about saying that the third one would lie and when he says he was lying about it, he was lying as well, and the right one was switching between lying and truth. Meanwhile, the one on the left is trying to figure out the truth, but he’s special.
May 16th, 2008 at 7:47 pm
When the right said “you weren’t lying”, that was in reference to the 2nd panel, where the middle head was telling the truth. In the 3rd panel, the head is lying when it says “I was lying”. Both “I was lying” and “No you weren’t” was about the line “He’d say ‘Yes, the 3rd head was lying’”, which was a true statement
May 16th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Because the 2nd and 3rd head would probably eat you first.
May 16th, 2008 at 9:28 pm
I don’t think the middle head can be the liar, it must be the switcher. In the second panel it says the first head would say one thing, and the third heat claims it is lying. In the third frame it says that it was in fact lying.If it was indeed lying the the second frame, it would be telling the truth in the third frame. If it was telling the truth in the second frame it would be lying in the third frame. Neither of these scenarios make it ONLY a truth teller or ONLY a liar.So, the middle is the switcher.