Madonna to play first Scottish gig at Hampden

castle skibo

POP queen Madonna is set to stage a massive one-off concert in Scotland.
The singer, who turns 50 in August, has been in secret talks to perform at Hampden Park this summer in front of 50,000 fans.
It will be her first gig in Scotland and is almost certain to sell out within hours.
It will be part of a string of worldwide gigs to promote her album Hard Candy, which is released this week.
Last night, a music insider said: “Madonna is aiming to play at Hampden and it is going to be an amazing show.
“She’s famous for her spectacular performances with costume changes and theatrics.
“Even at 50, she is still in great shape and looks amazing. With a back catalogue second to none, this is the show of the summer.”
Madonna’s only Scottish show will take place at the beginning of September and is likely to include a number of special guests in support.
Last night, touts were already offering tickets for the Hampden concert via the internet.
A spokesman for Madonna was unable to confirm the dates but admitted a tour was definitely in the offing - and Scotland was likely to be included.
While she has never played a gig here, Madonna is no stranger to Scotland.
She married film director Guy Ritchie at Skibo Castle in Sutherland in December 2000, where they also christened their son, Rocco John.
Madonna is the most successful female singer of all time with 60 top 10 singles and 13 top 10 albums.
But her live shows have sparked controversy in previous years.
In 2006, Vatican officials were upset when she staged her Confessions Tour in Rome - and hung off a cross while wearing a crown of thorns.
They claimed it was an insult to Catholics.

dailyrecord.co.uk


Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Friday, May 16th, 2008 at 2:24 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

13 Responses to “Madonna to play first Scottish gig at Hampden”

  1. Bryan Says:

    Its already black History month?

  2. Inigo Says:

    Where taken?

  3. Rich Says:

    this is not Dracula’s castle.

  4. Roxanne Says:

    It looks really nice

  5. Kerena Says:

    Nice explanation. To add, photographers have been using various techniques to accomplish this goal from the beginning by using filters and dodging and burning areas of a print.For example a photographer wants to capture a landscape with a dramatic cloud-filled sky. When he goes to make his print, the correct exposure for the land will leave the sky looking boring and underexposed; not at all like he remembers. So he shields the land portion from the light and just increases the exposure time for the sky portion, which darkens the clouds and reveals the detail that was hidden there in the dense emulsion on the negative.

  6. Raelyn Says:

    That looks awesome, is it a problem for Americans to travel through the area?

  7. Briony Says:

    No, why would that be a problem?

  8. Jennifer Says:

    I still don’t get why someone would want an HDR version of an image. I much prefer images which capture things as they actually look.What is it people like?

  9. Krystina Says:

    Here’s a few I’ve done, I try to keep it tasteful too. Working on a tutorial:http://homepages.nyu.edu/~msa286/main/photography/hdr/index.htmlalso, this one was a pretty successful HDR with a person, difficult to do when using multiple exposures. The difference between this and my best single RAW shot is night and day: http://homepages.nyu.edu/~msa286/main/photography/audiophiles/images/buddylarge.jpg

  10. Gaye Says:

    This is especially a problem with digital cameras. Film cameras where a little bit better.Anyways, the whole point is to capture the full range of light and colour that is normally lost in a regular digital photo.Then some retards figured out you could do all sorts of crazy things by overusing this idea. Things went downhill from there.

  11. Pippa Says:

    Exactly what I was going to say. Now I see why people rave about these HDR photos.

  12. Danny Says:

    Slow shutter speed. It’s true that it doesn’t look quite like that to the naked eye, but human perception of moving objects is probably impossible to capture in a static image.